The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. //--> 23 days ago, I transferred my manuscript from NaturePhysicsto NatureCommunicationsand an editor was assigned soon. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes publisher 14.0 days to publish the accepted manuscript online. Please read thedigital images integrity and standardspolicy. [CDATA[> We discourage deposition of references within the Supplementary Information as they will not be live links and will not contribute towards citation measures for the papers concerned. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. [duplicate]. Global Integrated Drought Monitoring and Prediction System (GIDMaPS) data sets. This leads to the contentious issue of whether generative AI models should be used in research communication and, if so, under what conditions. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles What does the typical workflow of a journal look like? is still under consideration, Handbook: Keep Calm And Wait: A Guide To Understanding Journal Statuses. Online submissions include a cover letter, a manuscript text file, individual figure files and optional Supplementary Information files. These Instructions are designed to give you everything you need to get started with online submission for this journal. Nature344, 524-526 (1990). Safety hazards posed by reagents or protocols should be identified clearly. All Rights Reserved. The process by which content is created. Example: Jones, R. A. L.Soft Machines: Nanotechnology and Life Ch. Bulk update symbol size units from mm to map units in rule-based symbology. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? Manuscript under consideration 16th September 21 2021.09.17 321active sites density30Response Letter From today, our authors have the option to take advantage of In Review, a free preprint deposition service integrated with the submission process to our journal. The dot pattern on a laser print often creates a moir pattern when scanned. (Abstracts or unrefereed web preprints do not compromise novelty). After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. . Internet Explorer). Call for papers: Applied. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in By the time you have accrued enough data to write a manuscript, you will likely want to publish as soon as possible. We recommend that authors refer to our double-blind peer review guidelines when preparing a double-blind peer review manuscript. Figures should not contain more than one panel unless the parts are logically connected; each panel of a multipart figure should be sized so that the whole figure can be reduced by the same amount and reproduced at the smallest size at which essential details are visible. Protocols deposited by the authors will be linked to the Methods section upon publication. Within the source data file, each figure or table (in the main manuscript and in the Supplementary Information) containing relevant data should be represented by a single sheet in an Excel document, or a single .txt file or other file type in a zipped folder. Q: My manuscript submitted to Nat. Would the magnetic fields of double-planets clash? We do, however, support the posting of preprints. A single column width measures 88 mm and a double column width measures 180 mm. How should I interpret a particular submission status? So, OP, it is good. March 1, 2023 by . Acknowledgements should be briefand should not include effusive comments. As part of the service offered by In Review, authors will be able to track the status of their manuscript thanks to a private peer review timeline, showing main events such as the recruitment of a reviewer or the receipt of a reviewer report. A complete manuscript package will help expedite your paper through the review and publication process. Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. We will monitor reception of this new service by our authors, and continue to evolve our offering to them in response to the needs of the community. For optimal results, prepare figures to fit the pdf page size (210 x 276 mm), and supply the figure in the format in which they were compiled. Based on Nature's website it looks like the editor sends a letter regardless of the decision so your editor is probably just writing the decision and it could be anything from accept without revision (hopefully) all the way to reject without reconsideration. //-->